lewd and lascivious
-
- Senior Lexiterian
- Posts: 611
- Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 2:14 pm
lewd and lascivious
You get two words for the price of one. This is SO lawyer-like to use two words when one will do. I am certain there is a subtle difference between the two, but I do not know what it is. I am also certain the origin of both will prove to be fascinating.
William A. Hupy
-
- Great Grand Panjandrum
- Posts: 3333
- Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 12:41 pm
- Location: RUSTON, LA
- Contact:
Re: lewd and lascivious
More years ago than I have been alive, I worked in a CA welfare department a couple of years and read various laws. I remembr my amusement over the list of synonyms in many of them, esp for cohabitation. (It didn't include 'shacking up,' at least per se.) Most of those lists seem to come from court decisions that turned on defining of similar words. If, for example, the law declares agains lascivious acts, and the defense claims the acts in question were merely lewd, their client may get off. Consequently, in writing law they often include strings of synonyms to protect their intentions. Do any lawyers or lawmakers out there agree or want to clarify?
pl
-
- Senior Lexiterian
- Posts: 611
- Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 2:14 pm
Re: lewd and lascivious
Perry, that is irrelevant, immaterial and incompetent. Just teasing. Lawyers are inclined for groups of three as in the example noted. A parcel of land is not just sold, it is conveyed, transferred and alienated - or use any three words you wish to "convey" the same meaning. It may have come from the practical considerations of covering all bases and contingencies, but I like to think it is also more poetic. Think of the many expressions we have that come in threes: wine, women and song; lock, stock and barrel; ifs, ands and buts; tic tac toe.
William A. Hupy
- Slava
- Great Grand Panjandrum
- Posts: 8491
- Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 9:31 am
- Location: Finger Lakes, NY
Re: lewd and lascivious
Speaking of things in threes, how about Tom Lehrer's "Smut"?
Lurid, licentious, and vile.
It even matches the original topic.
Lurid, licentious, and vile.
It even matches the original topic.
Life is like playing chess with chessmen who each have thoughts and feelings and motives of their own.
-
- Great Grand Panjandrum
- Posts: 3333
- Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 12:41 pm
- Location: RUSTON, LA
- Contact:
Re: lewd and lascivious
The laws I was reading back then often had more than three, even six or eight. To make sense i had to take one meaning and skip the the next train of thought.
pl
-
- Senior Lexiterian
- Posts: 611
- Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 2:14 pm
Re: lewd and lascivious
Excellent!Speaking of things in threes, how about Tom Lehrer's "Smut"?
Lurid, licentious, and vile.
It even matches the original topic.
William A. Hupy
-
- Great Grand Panjandrum
- Posts: 2784
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 4:41 am
- Location: Texas
Re: lewd and lascivious
Slava: I wasn't aware of Tom Lehrer's "Smut" until I Googled it.
It is lurid, licentious, and vile. Think of another synonym that begins with an l and put it in the place of vile. Then you will have alliterative smut. I like alliteration but am cautious about smut. How about the actor on "Two and a Half Men" who has denounced as smut the program he helped make popular? It may or may not be smut (I have never watched a full episode), but it is vapid and inane. If I were that actor on the program who went nuts, I might have gone nuts myself.
It is lurid, licentious, and vile. Think of another synonym that begins with an l and put it in the place of vile. Then you will have alliterative smut. I like alliteration but am cautious about smut. How about the actor on "Two and a Half Men" who has denounced as smut the program he helped make popular? It may or may not be smut (I have never watched a full episode), but it is vapid and inane. If I were that actor on the program who went nuts, I might have gone nuts myself.
It is dark at night, but the Sun will come up and then we can see.
Return to “Good Word Suggestions”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 0 guests